Stanmoreās āinterest is āservice magicā across the 14th to 17th centuries: the sort of functional help to solve everyday problems that a folk practitioner might provide to their neighbours for a feeā
āinstructions came from a ācunning manā or ācunning womanā. The concerns of their clients were routinely domestic, familial and financialā
āStanmoreās sympathies are with ordinary people and ordinary problems. This makes her reluctant to judge either their motives for unleashing magic on their neighbours or the efficacy of their methodsā
āOne frustrating consequence of Stanmoreās refusal to dismiss magicās efficacy is that she often avoids opportunities to assess rationally why it might have been perceived to have āworkedāā
āthereās little interrogation of how magic related to theology, or how different branches of knowledge might be distinguished; a topic fruitfully covered in Anthony Graftonās recent book Magusā
āStanmoreās great strength is as a social historian, and her research has won plaudits among her fellow academic historians for combing through church and legal records, and digging up more incidents of people caught practising magic than had ever been found beforeā
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.