âBernhardâs influence over the contemporary novel has followed a parabolic trajectory. He has gone from being a writersâ writer, a well-kept secret, to a writer whose influence is felt, even if indirectly, over a broad array of novels that have seen both sales and critical acclaimâ
âBernhard acolytes include Geoff Dyer, Ben Marcus, Ben Lerner, Julie Otsuka, Tim Parks, Emily Hall, Jordan Castro, Mark Haber, LĂĄszlĂł Krasznahorkai, Lucy Ellmann, Mauro Javier CĂĄrdenas, Claudia Piñeiro, Jen Craig, and Adam Ehrlich Sachsâ
âtraces of his style can be spotted further afield, in the work of Thuáșn, Roberto Bolaño, Danielle Dutton, Oli Hazzard, Rachel Cusk, and Mathias Ănardâ
âGeoff Dyer described Bernhardâs work as the culmination of a âEuropean tradition of the literature of neurastheniaâ; it now seems equally apt to place him as the progenitor of a younger, more globalâif not still largely US-centricâtradition of neurasthenic literatureâ
âThe key features that mark his styleâthe obsessive rants; the long, digressive sentences replete with repetitions and contradictions; plots that see their protagonist do little more than think and walkâare each distinctive enough that his influence can be easy to spotâ
âAdam Ehrlich Sachs has said that âyou know [Bernhardâs footprint] when you see it.â As he explains, there is âthe daisy-chained dialogue-attribution footprint, the exaggeration-to-the-point-of-madness footprint, the solely-internal-landscape-no-nature footprint, the single-paragraph footprint, the relentless-conceptual-critique-turned-somehow-into-fiction footprint, and so on.ââ
âthe most distinctive feature of Bernhardâs style to show its influence in the contemporary novel, and one often deployed by Sebald himself, is what I will call the Extremely Long Paragraph (ELP), about which relatively little has been saidâaside from the fact that his paragraphs are, indeed, notably longâ
âI would, as a matter of ritual, read a few pages of Bernhardâany would doâand would think how his work might be critiqued, perhaps even condescended to, in a workshop. The long sentences, the absence of plot, the rage, the propensity to tell (over and over again) rather than showâall stand opposed to the conventions of form and style that mark the MFA-to-industry literary pipelineâ
âI want to show how the ELP, among other things, has served as a response, of sorts, to our distracted ageâand to highlight not so much the inevitable death of the novel as the novelâs capacity to take root in even the harshest terrain and find a way, not despite but because of this harshness, to flourishâ
âEver-present distraction is impacting our capacity for â[t]he concentration, the focus, the solitude, the silenceâ (Roth), and the âattentionâ (Foer) required for âserious readingâ (Roth), âserious fictionâ (Parks), âdeepâ reading (Self), or âdevot[ing] oneself to the bookâ (Foer)â
âThomas Bernhard did not invent the ELP. Prototypes exist in the last section of James Joyceâs Ulysses (1922) and the beginning of Samuel Beckettâs Molloy (1951)â
âThe earliest well-known example of the ELP is in The Gates of Paradise (1960) by Polish author Jerzy Andrzejewski, which at 162 pages includes only two paragraphs (each only a sentence long), the latter of which is only five wordsâ
âThe next is in Dancing Lessons for the Advanced in Age (1964) by Czech author Bohumil Hrabal, which at 117 pages includes no chapter or paragraph breaks and consists of only one sentenceâ
âBernhard, however, was obsessed with the technique. His novels Yes (1978), The Cheap-Eaters (1980), Wittgensteinâs Nephew (1982), Concrete (1982), The Loser (1983), Woodcutters (1984), Old Masters: A Comedy (1985), and Extinction (1986) each consist of only one paragraph; Correction (1975) consists of two; and the memoir Gathering Evidence (1985) consists of only fiveâ
âW. G. Sebald, whose masterpiece Austerlitz (2001) consists of only one paragraphâ
âLucy Ellmann, whose Goldsmiths Prizeâwinning Ducks, Newburyport (2019) serves as an edge case for the ELP (it consists ostensibly of one single-sentence paragraph interrupted by multiple short interludes), placed Bernhard second in a list of her top six authors, saying that he âchanged the direction of the novel.ââ
âMark Haber, author of the one-paragraph-long Reinhardtâs Garden (2019), told an interviewer that if a reader compares Haberâs work to Bernhardâs, it is âthe biggest compliment in the world.ââ
âDavid Albahari, author of the one-paragraph-long Leeches (2011) is also explicit about Bernhardâs influence on him, particularly with respect to his use of the ELP: âThomas Bernhard had a huge influence on me in terms of the form of the novel,â he told an interviewer at The Arts Fuse. âAlmost all my novels are written in one uninterrupted paragraph.ââ
âLĂĄszlĂł Krasznahorkai, meanwhile, whose novels tend to use very few paragraphs and whose novella The Last Wolf (released in English translation in 2016) consists of only one, has admitted that Bernhardâs work âmade a very deep impressionâ on himâ
âHoracio Castellanos Moyaâs single-paragraph novel Revulsion (1997) shows Bernhardâs influence even in its subtitle: Thomas Bernhard in San Salvadorâ
âOther novels that use the technique include By Night in Chile (2000) by Roberto Bolaño, Zone (2008) by Mathias Ănard, SPRAWL (2018) by Danielle Dutton, Dead Souls (2021) by Sam Riviere, Lorem Ipsum (2021) by Oli Hazzard, The Hole by JosĂ© Revueltas (1969, published in English translation in 2018), and Chinatown (2005) by Thuáșnâ
âParagraphs aid readers. Paragraphs help readers navigate textsâ
âParagraphs also offer readers places to start, pause, and stopâ
âOnce the reader reaches the end of a paragraph, it is likewise a convenient place to pause and consider the paragraph as a whole or to take a breakâ
âThis may all seem a bit obvious, but it can help us understand what happens when an author uses the ELPâ
âA reader canât know if the next sentence will bring something to completion until they read the next sentence. â[I]n order to draw a limit to thinking, we should have to think both sides of this limit,â Ludwig Wittgenstein writes in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921). A paragraph break, which allows us to glance beyond it without having to read beyond it, serves as a tool for seeing the other side of a limitâ
âWith no paragraph breaks, there is no way to see the other side of the limit until one reaches the blank space that marks the bookâs endâ
âTim Parks argues that one of the most insidious effects of 21st-century technology on attention âis not simply that one is interrupted; it is that one is actually inclined to interruption.ââ
âThe ELP, however, as shown above, asks the interested reader to suspend this inclinationâ
âAre Roth, Self, Parks, and the rest merely throwing a collective millenarian fit? Not quiteâ
âWhat these arguments overshadow, however, is the novelâs versatility, its capacity to bend in form and adapt to the particular problems of its dayâ
âRecent proliferation of the ELP shows the novel responding to its threats by offering, within itself, a tool through which readers can resist the habits that modern technologies otherwise force upon themâ
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.