âI was motivated to understand what it would take to help us transition towards practices closer to agroecologyâ
âagroecology has come to be seen as solution to the global agrarian and food crisis where farmers are not compensated equitably and food insecurity prevails among the massesâ
âTo ensure âpower is distributed equitably and intersectionally among the direct producers and eatersâ (Akram-Lodhi 2021, 687), it is necessary to integrate small farmers and prioritize their food sovereignty in a locally embedded, democratized food systemâ
âagroecology emphasizes the âart of farmingâ that reinvigorates indigenous methods of farming to improve soil fertility, minimize requirement of external inputs, and foster local knowledge-based problem solving (Akram-Lodhi 2021, 709)â
âAn agroecological approach requires developing an alternate paradigm of agrarian relations that organize small farmers to achieve âcollective production on a national scaleâ and center knowledge as a force of production (Akram-Lodhi 2021, 690).â
âI set an ambitious goal for my farm experiment. I wanted to develop a sustainable, profitable farm in a manner that is replicable and scalable for the average farmer of our village. It should not need heavy upfront investments, and it should be able to generate enough income to sustain at least one working class familyâ
âThree years later, we have sowed many things but have rarely achieved a good crop stand. With time our germination rate worsened, and we never recovered a decent output comparable to the conventional system. What happened?â
âLimits of machineryâ
âYour village is not my village: what works in irrigated contexts does not work in rain-fed contextsâ
âGiven that this was an individual effort, our ability to plan the watershed was vastly constrained and we continued to deal with moisture management challengesâ Note: This is the major concern with agroecology: the efforts are *individual. We need wider scale planning.*
âFarming is a complex, technical, and multi-skilled endeavorâ
âI assumed that I should be able to trial and error my way through learning the basics by using the extensive resources available to farmersâ
âHowever, designing the farm proved challenging and I felt I needed multiple degrees to break this challenge. A farmer must be a hydrologist, a soil scientist, a climate reader, an agronomist, an expert of cropping systems, a landscape reader, a business managerâbasically an all-in-oneâ Note: This is the power of the division of labour. If one individual must know and be responsible for all of this, scaling becomes impossible, let alone rest.
âThe force of knowledge in a zero-tillage system is built on years of generational knowledge that gives the farmer the eyes to read everything on their lands, from the soil to the plants, insects, animals, and skiesâ
âCapitalist agriculture has come at the cost of loss of the âart of farmingââ
âScientific precision vs. applicationâ
âA farm experiment like mine is a failing endeavor without engaging with the socio-ecological relationships and practices of land management and farming across the farm, village, and regional landscapeâ
âAgroecological transformations have been successful in several scenarios where small farmers are organized on a large scale with substantial state supportâ
âThis support is indispensable to transitioning to an agrarian system that prioritizes the development of knowledge as a key force of production. We have so far failed in our endeavor as an isolated island of experimentation on degraded lands surrounded by a hostile regime of productionâ
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.