âMirzoeffâs new book, White Sight: Visual Politics and Practices of Whiteness, published in February by the MIT Press, explores how systems of white supremacy see, and thus order, the world in the unbroken history of colonialism, up to the present dayâ
âMirzoeff spoke with me about the meaning of âwhite sight,â its long history, and the concurrent legacy of resistance against itâ
âThis is a collective enterprise, a systemic making visibleâ Note: A political work, the distribution of the sensible, a making visible that simultaneously makes else invisible. See Ranciere.
âwhite sight is always relationalâa way of organizing the world so that the invented collective âwhite peopleâ can create a reality that accords to their sense of the worldâ
âif it doesnât, they use violence to close the gap between their version of reality and what existsâ
âwe already know what white sight is because every time a cop comes up to someone, they make an immediate judgment based on their perception of whether that person is or is not white. And they act accordinglyâ
âAt another level, white sight is an operating system of what it is to make whiteness and white supremacy, which functions by connecting assumptions, contexts, learned experience, stereotypes, and techniques into a wholeâ
âWhite sight regulates bodies, land, and the relations between them by means of its capacity to survey colonized space, to claim it, and to place all forms of life under surveillanceâ
âI think of white sight not as flat, like a painting, but as deeply layered and sedimented, as in geology where you have stratigraphic layers of rockâ
âOne of the mistakes in the first generation of so-called whiteness studies was, in retrospect, that it was often said that âwhiteness is unmarked.â And thatâs clearly not trueâ
âThe whole point about whiteness is that itâs absolutely marked, while creating a structure of unknowing among white people. But no one whoâs not white is unclear about how very marked whiteness isâitâs visibly and blatantly marked, especially in colonial situationsâ
âFrantz Fanon called the colonial regime a âworld of statues,â and he didnât mean it metaphorically. He meant that the colonizer will put up a statue in the town square of a colonized city as a foundational act of colonizationâ
âwhy and when the statue of the Apollo Belvedere began to be used as the figure for whiteness. It happened at the beginning of the 19th century, when Haiti had just carried out its revolution against slavery (1791â1804). No sooner had this âunthinkableâ revolution happened than the figure of the Apollo Belvedere became the racializing type of whitenessâperfect whiteness, in a way no person could actually beâ
âwhen I saw someone get killedâ[the antifascist counterprotester] Heather Heyerâdeliberately murdered in the street over a statue, then I realized that this wasnât just about representation; whiteness actually is a statueâ
âThis violence is connected to the state linguisticallyâvia the word âstatuteââbut also substantively. In the American South, there are laws that protect statues, meaning that you canât move them and you canât take them downâ
âA material example of how white supremacy and the statue are directly connected is that Confederate statues were frequently placed right outside the courthouse. The law of white supremacy and the statue were right next to each other, creating an infrastructureâ
âWhen Algeria gained independence in 1962, one of the first things they did was take down the statues that the French had put up around Algiers and other cities. This was known locally as the âwar on statues.ââ
âstarted Rhodes Must Fall in 2015 to bring down the statue of Rhodes at the University of Cape Town. This statue occupied a stunning location, with a backdrop of mountains and a view down to the seaâthat position was all about colonizing white sightâ
âsomething happens when you take down a statue. It creates a new energyâ
âitâs not just that the statue has come down, itâs whatâs not there that is now palpable, and thereâs an energy around that space that allows you to think, what else might we do here?â
âI donât want people just to feel bad about whiteness. No. I want you to go on strike. By striking, I donât mean the withdrawal of labor, because itâs not that kind of strike. Itâs a refusalâa refusal to go along with the practices and the violences that make white sight ânormal.ââ
âdonât break one window as an activist organization, break them all to show that this is not vandalism but a making visible of the operations of powerâ
âI think, for example, of protests during the 2015 #FeesMustFall movement in South Africa, where white students arranged themselves on the edges of the demonstrations so that if police were going to make arrests, they had to take visibly white bodies firstâ
âThatâs a deployment of white privilege, but itâs also making it highly visible. And it was a decision with which the Black South African students were in agreementâ
ârather than saying, âWe as white-identified people are going to choose to do this,â itâs vital to be in relation to social movements led by feminists, LGBTQ+, Black, Brown, Indigenous, and other people of color and ask, âWhat would you like us to do?ââ
âMurmurations are patterns created by flocks of birds, particularly starlings, that swirl and circle in remarkable, fractal ways. I sat there for a long, long time watching the film, remembering a number of conversations Iâd had with Fred Moten, my colleague, and some things Iâd read by Saidiya Hartman, both of whom have used the idea of murmuration within the Black radical tradition. It is a different way to be together. It is a flying in formation, a way to put your body in formation, and it creates information, but not as the be all and end all. It creates informal beauty in transient patternsâ
âthereâs a kind of writing here, a kind of data inscription that generates a way of being together. Itâs a way to âconsent not to be a single being,â as Ădouard Glissant put it, and to imagine a way of being beyond the heroic individual, which humans have found so hard to imagineâ
âThe murmuration shows how one could decenter âtheâ Human, moving away from what philosopher Sylvia Wynter calls âmonohumanism,â the idea that whiteness is the one way to be humanâ
âThereâs always anxiety from elites that those who are under surveillance are murmuring among themselves, which indeed they are. And that might lead to some other formationâ Note: Yes! This is the end of Billy Bud, a murmur amongst the crew. A serendipitous connection, given Mirzoeffâs earlier invocation of Melvilleâs Bartleby.
âAn old word for starling is âstare.â The murmuration of stares is a way of seeing beyond white sightâa collective way of seeing as something other than a single beingâ
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.