ââCosmismââtoo often accepted as a framework within which, under the rubric of a âcommon task,â differences are effaced, neutralized, or, at best, reconciledâcomprises at least two diametrically opposed lines: lines that circumscribe no common figure and mark out no common groundâ
âThese are lines of struggle that cannot be reduced to a common geometry because one of them is directed against generalization as suchâ
âThere are at least two kinds of Cosmismâ
âOne is overly retentive, bound by the ascetic morality of due, fraternal, museum-like, saddled with familial duty toward dead fathers, whose right to resurrection is guaranteed by the sonsâ
âthen there is the other: wholly given over to the imagination, wanton in the outlaw ethos of permissiveness, wayward and amicable, experimental, sporting with the forces entwined in the instinct for immortality, shouting forth its causeâ
âOne is the Cosmism of âcommon causeâ (Nikolai Fedorov); the other is the anarchic Biocosmism of âmy causeâ (Meine Sache: that Max Stirnerâs influence swelled the sails of Aleksandr Svyatogorâs and Aleksandr Yaroslavskyâs âBiocosmist shipsâ is hardly a secret)â
âWhere shall we look for our comrades? In the forest. Who are they? The elemental forces. How to come to terms with themâand how to let them speak freely?â
âThrough revolution: âquietâ at first, then armed with a rifle and a battle cryâ
âBiocosmism starts out as a search for oneâs comrades among the elemental forces and their meshworkâcrystals, volcanoes, plants, animals, planets, starsâechoing one another and casting off their bonds in the vast expanse of the revolutionâ
âWhat is Biocosmism? What is its mute premise? Plunged into the Biocosmic forest, we encounter strange meshworkâ
âThe adjective biocosmique appears four times in Deleuze and Guattariâs Anti-Oedipus: thrice referring to âbiocosmic memoryâ and once to âbiocosmic research,â thus expanding the purview of Biocosmism, as conceived by Svyatogor (language, style, poesis, rhythm, wit, sense, meaning, spirit, consciousness, society and social movements, organism, heart, technology [ships, wind turbines], artistic workâŚ)â
âThe discussion of âbiocosmic memoryâ makes reference to Nietzscheâs Genealogy of Morals, while âbiocosmic researchâ is mentioned in connection with the work of the psychoanalyst and bioenergeticist Wilhelm Reich, specifically his The Function of the Orgasm, thus expanding the ranks of comrades and the meaning of Biocosmism itselfâ
âNietzsche, the arch-enemy of Nikolai Fedorov, was attentively read and admired by Aleksandr Svyatogor and Aleksandr Yaroslavskyâ
âGenealogy of Morals, transposed into a geology in Deleuze and Guattariâs A Thousand Plateaus, was written in just twenty days: a truly vulcanic outputâ
âThrough the geological work of ascetic domestication, the earth actually becomes an effigy molded from the ashes of ancestorsâa corpse demanding repayment of debt from the living, stricken with spiritual dyspepsia and an atrophied capacity for forgettingâ
âearth itself is complicit in this, given that is elemental force consists in enclosing, limiting, distributing, registering (here we are back in the pages of Anti-Oedipus, where the full body of the earth is described as âthe element of the disjunctive synthesis and its reproduction.â)â
âprecisely the conflict described in the Genealogy of Morals through the evolution of the animal, which starts out remembering how to forget and ends up forgetting how it is done, proclaiming this forgetting to be memory and so becoming complicit in this derailmentâ
âthe triumph of the earth, which emerges victorious in the clash of the elements, and its transformation into a cemeteryâ
âWhat is lacking from the triumphant, too earthly earth, finally equal to itself, enclosed in a carapace, is fresh air, breathâ
âIt lacks a pinch of Biocosmic revolutionismâ
âThe Biocosmic heresy, on the contrary, decries not the difference between faces, but the schism between faces and shapeshifting âbetween the earth, entombing the elements within faces and turning faces into the facing of objects, and the earth of ferment and shapeshifting, leading backwardâfrom objects and facesâtoward the liberated elemental forcesâ
âBiocosmism, however, does not entail a loss of face: âthe Biocosmic face is smiling, cheerful, possessed of an absolute laughter,â writes Svyatogor, adding, âone must feel the beast within oneself.ââ
âThe camouflage of a smiling biocosmic face conceals a volcanic forest: underground ferment, roots of trees, animalsâ paths and lairs, the âwarm commingling of forest tales and dreams.ââ
âMy path! You lead me to the deathless beyondâme, a son of the Earth and the blue stars. I am a cosmic wanderer.â
âWhat are Svyatogorâs biocosmic ships? Perhaps they are faces, whose means of locomotion is shapeshifting? In that case, biocosmic content, traversing space aboard these ships, is the erupting earth itself, the elemental forceâthe unregistered and unregistrable passengerâ
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.