âThe sensational entrance into mass consciousness of David Lynch and Mark Frostâs Twin Peaks, 27 years ago, was an event that defies replication.â
âTo begin with, back then there actually was a mass consciousnessâor, at least, there were a lot of people watching the same shows at the same time.â
âNo Netflix in 1990. No personalized viewing recommendations. Just the perennially white-hot maw of the popular imagination, into whichâluscious and secretive as a fog bankârolled Twin Peaks, with its unprecedented stew of occultism, irony, horror, deadpan, soap opera, canned narrative, dream logic, burningly beautiful young people, and postmodern diddling-about.â
âThe showâs pilot had the feel of an initiation, as if some species of hermetic lore was now being diffused outward, gamma-saturating the frontal lobes of the public.â
âAnd nowâthe intervening quarter century having been, apparently, a mere blip, a quick writhe of Lynchian static across the screenâTwin Peaks is back for a belated Season 3 on Showtime, featuring many of the original cast members and helmed once again by writer-director Lynch and writer Frost.â
âItâs vulgar to query the creative impulse behind this resurrection, but somewhere in there, surely, is the sense that they kind of blew it the first time around.â
âTwin Peaks dominated 1990, must-see TV for a global viewership that included, apocryphally, Queen Elizabeth II. And then it fell to pieces in 1991, superseded as spectacle by the Gulf War and done in artistically by its own internal entropy, by the loopy plotlines, tonal wobbles, bad ideas, and out-of-control conceits that we now recognize as the symptoms of a long-form TV series entering its decadent phase.â
âThat the organic breakdown occurred in Season 2ârather than in Season 4 or 5, as it might nowadaysâonly highlights the volatility and then-novelty of the constituent elements.â
âBecause letâs be clear: Without Twin Peaks, and its big-bang expansion of the possibilities of television, half your favorite shows wouldnât exist.â
âThe absorptive, all-in serial, sonically and visually entire, novelistically cantilevered with deep structure and extending backwards into the viewerâs brain, was simply not a thing before Lynch and Frost.â
âWith Twin Peaks they effectively renegotiated TVâs contract with its audience.â
âYou tuned in psychedelically, as it were, ready to be transported.â
âThe story arcs, the curves of character development, were long, longer than the show itself, receding into mystery.â
âIf you missed an episode, you were disoriented. If you watched every episode carefully, you might still be disoriented. Remarkably, this has become something like the norm.â
âThus the drama of Twin Peaks unfolded on two planes: what was happening in the showâwho killed Laura Palmer?, etc.âand then, more subliminally, what the show was doing to the medium, to television.â
âAnd on both planes it was the same story, a reckless privileging of the irrational and the nocturnal, and a push to see how much of it we could take.â
âStylistically, the most immediate posthumous effect of all this might have been the gnostic, everything-signifies vibe of The X-Files, but there are glimmering splinters of Twin Peaks in Breaking Badâs trippy desert-sizzle; in the irruptive, disabling dreamtime of Bran Stark on Game of Thrones; and in the absurdist plot spirals, the gizmos and MacGuffins, of Lost. The Sopranos paid homage with Agent Cooperâesque fugue states and shots of trees blowing in the wind, rippling in their fullness and strangeness.â
âThen there was the garmonbozia. In Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me, the much-scorned theatrical-release prequel that Lynch made after the end of the series, the little red-suited man pops up again and slurs out something that gets subtitled as I want all my ⌠garmonbozia (pain and sorrow). Moments later, we see him in horrible close-up, nibbling on a spoonful of something that looks like creamed corn. Deep as we are in Lynchian wackiness here, the meaning is not obscure: The little red-suited man and his fellow denizens of the dream realm have a taste for human suffering, which they call garmonbozia and consume in the form of a viscous, pearlescent psychic distillate.â
âTwin Peaks, as a narrative, had a core of almost blackout darkness.â
âFor all its whimsy, Twin Peaks was piled high with garmonbozia.â
âViewers, in fact, had never before experienced such (pain and sorrow) on the small screen, and this too was part of the showâs breakthroughâto blow open, in a subterranean way, the emotional range of TV drama. Dollops of garmonbozia have since become standard.â
âWhat can, or should, we expect from Season 3? To calmly anticipate another ream of seamless prestige television, of the sort that is now ubiquitous, feels like an insult to the raw wizardry of David Lynch. We will watch it, at any rate, not anchored to time and the boxy television set, but weightlessly adrift in our personal viewing cells.â
âIt might be great. It might be a disaster. But it wonât blow our minds. It canât, because that already happened.â
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.