âWhen he was eighty-five, Waclaw Szpakowski wrote a treatise for a lifetime project that no one had known about. Titled âRhythmical Lines,â it describes a series of labyrinthine geometrical abstractions, each one produced from a single continuous line.â
âHeâd begun these drawings around 1900, when he was just seventeenâwhat started as sketches he then formalized, compiled, and made ever more intricate over the course of his life.â
âThough the kernels of his ideas came from informal notebooks, the imposing virtuosity and opaqueness of Szpakowskiâs final drawings are anything but spontaneous or random. His enigmatic processâhow he could draw with such supreme evenhandedness, could make his designs so pristine and yet so intricateâis hinted at only in his few visible erasure marks.â
âThese works did not reach an audience until 1978, five years after Szpakowkiâs death; today theyâre still obscure and easily misunderstood.â
âaudiences today may understand the meaning at the heart of Szpakowskiâs project better than Rodchenko or Kandinsky ever could. The benefit of seeing art in this post-everything period is that a slew of categoriesâAbstract? Modernist? Minimalist? Conceptual?âcan come together like a poker hand, considered in the palm all at once. When you find out that Szpakowski worked in isolation for three decades, youâre dealt another card: Outsider.â
âBut Szpakowski wasnât at all provincial. A trained architect who worked as an engineer, he played the violin on the side (he later said his drawings could be used as musical scores).â
âHis notebooks are like a twentieth-century version of Leonardo da Vinciâs, with enthusiastic scribblings next to observations of architecture and diagrams of natural phenomena, from ocean currents to fir-tree needles.â
âThough this text is aimed at an imaginary future viewer, Szpakowski could never have anticipated the particular tensions of the twenty-first century gaze: our initial suspicion that the designs, for their perfection, must be computer generated; and, upon discovering that theyâre not, our fetishizing his hand-drawing technique.â
âSzpakowski took issue, in his lifetime, with the swallowed-whole way of looking that rendered his designs mere decorations, perhaps drawing on older referents like the ancient Greek meander motif or textile patterns. He insists that âa single glance would not be enough,â and that his were in fact âlinear ideas,â with âinner contentâ accessible only to those who follow the line with their eyes on its journey from left to right: a process not unlike reading.â
âthe velocity of Szpakowskiâs drawings, the way in which, upon entering, you find yourself on a one-way road without median or rest stop, victim to the hair-raising sharpness of his turns.â
âSzpakowskiâs systematization and its âinner contentâ: the ways in which we bind infinity in legibility, dooming any description to a fragment.â
âSam Lewittâs works are strikingly close to Szpakowskiâs, but only formally. Lewittâs curving lines reference and function as blown-up models of heating systems used in telecommunication technology. Though both artists are interested in the efficiency of form as it may relate to invisible forces, Lewittâs work takes a critical distance typical of contemporary work that renders Szpakowskiâs inventiveness quaint.â
âperhaps itâs âthe ultimate nerdiness of Szpakowski, how in a very isolated way he was insisting that he discovered something no one else ever thought of.â She paused, âItâs not naĂŻve in a negative way. Itâs a sense of freedom, and I think that kind of freedom is important for artists to be able to create.ââ
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.