âRadiohead belong to ârock,â and if rock has a characteristic subject, as country musicâs is small pleasures in hard times (getting by), and rapâs is success in competition (getting over), that subject must be freedom from constraint (getting free).â
âA description of the condition of the late 1990s could go like this: At the turn of the millennium, each individual sat at a meeting point of shouted orders and appeals, the TV, the radio, the phone and cell, the billboard, the airport screen, the inbox, the paper junk mail.â
âEach person discovered that he lived at one knot of a network, existing without his consent, which connected him to any number of recorded voices, written messages, means of broadcast, channels of entertainment, and avenues of choice.â
âIt was a culture of broadcast: an indiscriminate seeding, which needed to reach only a very few, covering vast tracts of our consciousness.â
âTo make a profit, only one message in ten thousand needed to take root, therefore messages were strewn everywhere. To live in this network felt like something, but surprisingly little in the culture of broadcast itself tried to capture what it felt like. Instead, it kept bringing pictures of an unencumbered luxurious life, songs of ease and freedom, and technological marvels, which did not feel like the life we lived.â
âAnd if you noticed you were not represented? It felt as if one of the few unanimous aspects of this culture was that it forbade you to complain, since if you complained, you were a trivial human, a small person, who misunderstood the generosity and benignity of the message system.â
âRadioheadâs success lay in their ability to represent the feeling of our age; they did not insist on being too much advanced in the âadvancedâ music they acquired. The beeps and buzzes never seemed like the source of their energy, but a means theyâd stumbled upon of finally communicating the feelings they had always held.â
âAnd yet the religion in the music is not about salvationâitâs about the authority of voices, the wish to submit and the discovery of a consequent resistance in oneself.â
âIt is antireligious, though attuned to transcendence. The organ in a church can be the repository of sublime power: a bundling of human throats in its brass pipes, or all the instruments known to man in its stops.â
âYou can hear your own small voice responding, within something so big that it manifests a threat of your voice merely being played mechanically and absorbed into a totality. To sing with an organ (as Yorke does at the end of Kid A) can be to discover oneâs own inner voice in distinction to it; and at the same time to wish to be lost, absorbed, overwhelmed within it.â
âSublime experience, the tradition says, depends on a relation to something that threatens. Traditionally it depended on observing from a point of safety a power, like a storm, cataract, or high sea, that could crush the observer if he were nearer. (By compassing the unencompassable power in inner representation, it was even suggested, you could be reminded of the interior power of the moral faculty, the human source of a comparable strength.) Radiohead observe the storm from within it. Their music can remind you of the inner overcoming voice, itâs true. But then the result is no simple access of power. This sublime acknowledges a different kind of internalization, the drawing of the inhuman into yourself; and also a loss of your own feelings and words and voice to an outer order that has come to possess them.â
âThe more I try to categorize why Radioheadâs music works as it does, and by extension how pop works, the more it seems clear that the effect of pop on our beliefs and actions is not really to create either one. Pop does, though, I think, allow you to retain certain things youâve already thought, without your necessarily having been able to articulate them, and to preserve certain feelings you have only intermittent access to, in a different form, music with lyrics, in which the cognitive and emotional are less divided.â
âI think songs allow you to steel yourself or loosen yourself into certain kinds of actions, though they donât start anything.â
âAnd the particular songs and bands you like dictate the beliefs you can preserve and reactivate, and the actions you can prepareâand which songs and careers will shape your inchoate private experience depends on an alchemy of your experience and the art itself.â
âPop is neither a mirror nor a Rorschach blot, into which you look and see only yourself; nor is it a lecture, an interpretable poem, or an act of simply determinate speech. It teaches something, but only by stimulating and preserving things that you must have had inaugurated elsewhere.â
âOr it prepares the ground for these discoveries elsewhereâoften knowledge you might never otherwise have really âknown,â except as it could be rehearsed by you, then repeatedly reactivated for you, in this medium.â
âThe situation we confront now is a new necessity, not blameless like wind or water and yet not fatal as from a tyrant or executioner. The nature we face is a billowing atmospheric second nature made by man. It is the distant soft tyranny of other men, wafting in diffuse messages, in the abdication of authority to technology, in dissembling of responsibility under cover of responsibility and with the excuse of helpâgutless, irresponsible, servile, showing no naked force, only a smiling or a pious face. The âtheyâ are cowardly friends. They are here to help you be happy and make fruitful choices. (We can wipe you out anytime.)â
âAt its best, Radioheadâs music reactivates the moods in which you once noticed you ought to refuse. It can abet an impersonal defiance. This is not a doctrine the band advances, but an effect of the aesthetic. It doesnât name a single enemy. It doesnât propose revolution. It doesnât call you to overthrow an order that you couldnât take hold of anyway at any single point, not without scapegoating a portion and missing the whole. This defianceâit might be the one thing we can manage, and better than sinking beneath the waves. It requires the retention of a private voice.â
âRadioheadâs songs suggest that you should erect a barrier, even of repeated minimal words, or the assertion of a âwe,â to protect yourselfâand then there proves to be a place in each song to which you, too, canât be admitted, because the singer has something within him closed to interference, just as every one of us does, or should. Weâll all have to find the last dwellings within ourselves that are closed to intrusion, and begin from there. The politics of the next age, if we are to survive, will be a politics of the re-creation of privacy.â
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.