âThis is all a bit reminiscent of the hair-raising stories of the production of Werner Herzogâs rainforest epic Aguirre, the Wrath of God, in which arduousness is felt to entail authenticity, as though the movie is a reenactment of the events it records rather than a mere Hollywood facsimile.â
ââThis film is based on actual historical events,â proclaims a solemn note near the end of the long credits. âDialogue and certain events and characters contained in the film were created for the purposes of dramatization.â Viewers should be warned, however, that the balance of history and fantasy is actually almost entirely the reverse. The Revenant is, in truth, an almost wholly fictional film. Certain historical events and characters were added for the purposes of verisimilitude.â
âThe film almost has a surfeit of natural beauty, spangled with glinting sunlight, not always clearly keyed to whatâs happening among the human characters. The rushing rivers, the majestic trees, and the frigid winter landscape dwarf the human presence.â
âThe sinister Fitzgerald is given the best line in the film, suggesting a certain anarchic randomness in the world of beast and man. âGod,â he gnomically proclaims, âis a squirrel.ââ
âDespite its flimsy historical underpinnings, The Revenant is actually a dream-film throughout. There are sequencesâlike the improbable dive over a cliff into the waiting arms of a huge tree, or the abandoned cathedral equipped with a Baroque crucifix and a silently swinging bellâwhere you arenât quite sure, and you donât much mind, if what youâre watching is meant to be âreallyâ happening to Hugh Glass or just transpiring in his (or perhaps Iñårrituâs) head. Itâs as though Iñårritu has determined that revenants are uniquely prone to dreams (rĂȘves), and that the moviemakerâs job is to fix them with ardor and arduousness.â
Navigation
Backlinks
There are no backlinks to this post.